WANLURA DIENGDOH
Plis Khymdeit – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner (herein referred as the defendant) being aggrieved with the impugned judgment and order dated 04.07.2017 passed by the learned District Judge, East Khasi Hills, Shillong in Title Civil Appeal No. 1 (H) 2014 dismissing the appeal and upholding the judgment and decree dated 30.05.2014 passed in T.S. No. 10 (H) of 2008 by the Assistant District Judge wherein, a decree of eviction had been passed against the defendant, to quit and vacate the suit premises.
2. The brief facts are that the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) had filed a suit for ejectment against the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) in respect of the suit premises situated at Police Bazar Shillong where the defendant is a tenant carrying on a business of wool and woolen garments in the name M/s Sharma. The tenancy was created by (Late) Bhagwan Das Jhunjhunwala, the father of the plaintiff vide an agreement dated 21.08.1973. It appears that by a family agreement dated 04.01.2007 the suit premises fell into the share of the
Sadashiv Ramrao Hadbe v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Ramdas v. State of Maharashtra
Abbas Ahmed Choudhury v. State of Assam
Raju v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rai Sandeep @ Deepu v. State of NCT of Delhi)
Tameezuddin @ Tammu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra
Ritesh Tiwari v. State of U.P.
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeira
Bhimanna v. State of Karnataka
Vijay Alias Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ranjit Hazarika v. State of Assam
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh
B.C. Deva v. State of Karnataka
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.