SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Megh) 21

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, WANLURA DIENGDOH
Director General, BSF – Appellant
Versus
Padh S. D. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Paul, CGC
For the Respondents: R. Gurung, Adv.

ORDER :

Mohammad Rafiq, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the Director General, Border Security Force (BSF), New Delhi and other three officers of the BSF, challenging the judgment of the Single Bench of this Court dated 15.11.2017, whereby the writ petition filed by Ex. Constable Padh SD was allowed and the order dated passed by the Commandant 19th Battalion BSF, Shillong-appellant No. 4 herein, dismissing the respondent/writ petitioner from service and the subsequent order dated 05.07.2016 passed by the Deputy Inspector General/CLO (D&L), BSF-appellant No. 2 herein, commuting the sentence of dismissal from service to rigorous imprisonment for 89 days in Force custody and forfeiture of two years of service for the purpose of promotion, were both quashed and set aside.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the respondent/writ petitioner while serving as a Constable of 'E' Coy under 19th Battalion, BSF, Shillong, was charged under Sections 34(a), 40 and 19(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short the 'Act of 1968') for the following offences:-

    "(a) Making a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top