HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
W. Diengdoh, J.
Ronilla Ch. Marak & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Aftar Ali & Ors. - Respondents
MAC App. No. 5 of 2018 with CRAPPL. No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 27-08-2021
Motor Accident - Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166
Fact of the Case:
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to the claimant for a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of the deceased. The claimant and the insurance company appealed the decision, contesting the quantum of the award.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the evidence and legal precedents to determine the deceased's income, future prospects, and personal expenses. It modified the compensation amount and directed the insurance company to deposit the revised award.
Issues: Quantum of compensation, calculation of deceased's income, future prospects, and personal expenses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on legal precedents to determine the deceased's income, future prospects, and personal expenses, and modified the compensation amount accordingly.
Final Decision: The court modified the compensation amount and directed the insurance company to deposit the revised award. The appeals were disposed of with no cost.
JUDGMENT
1. Matter taken up today via video conferencing.
2. The learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, West Garo Hills District, Tura after adjudication on an application claiming for compensation on account of a motor vehicle accident in MAC case No. 59 of 2010 has finally disposed of the same vide Judgment and Order dated 09.04.2018 by, inter alia awarding a sum of Rs. 18,22,128/- (Rupees eighteen lakh twenty two thousand one hundred and twenty eight) only to the Claimant therein.
3. Before proceeding further, it would be elucidative to advert to the events which culminated in the said award being given to the Claimant.
4. A motor vehicle accident occurred on 19.02.2010 at about 11.00 PM or so near Nehru Park, Tura, on the NEC road to Phulbari in which Lazarush Ch. Marak was dashed by a vehicle being Mini Truck bearing registration number ML-09-5197 causing grievous hurt to him for which he was immediately taken to Tura Civil Hospital for treatment, however at the hospital, he succumbed to his injuries.
5. The parent of the deceased then preferred an accident claim application before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal in short), Tura claiming compensation by arraying the owner and driver of the said vehicle No ML-09- 5197 as well as the Insurer of the said vehicle, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd as opposite parties. The Owner and Driver failed to appear to contest the case resulting in the matter proceeding exparte against them. The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd filed the written statement and contested the claim.
6. The MACT framed as many as six issues and the matter proceeded for evidence and argument of the parties contesting. After hearing the parties, the learned Member, MACT passed the impugned award (supra).
7. Not satisfied with the said award, the appellants, Smti Ronilla Ch. Marak and Shri Berosing B. Marak (parents of the deceased) preferred an appeal before this Court registered as MAC Appeal No. 5 of 2018. The Opposite Party/Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd, also being dissatisfied with the said award has filed a cross-appeal registered as Cross Appeal No. 1 of 2019.
8. Office note dated 19.07.2019 will show that the Respondent No. 3 Md. Aftar Ali, Driver of the Mini Truck No. ML-09-5197 (corresponding Respondent No. 1 in MAC App. No. 5 of 2018) has since expired and the notice issued upon Mr. Wahedul Enamul Wahab (corresponding Respondent No. 2 in MACApp. No. 5 of 2018) has returned with a note that the same has been refused to be accepted. Therefore, only the main contestants remain in the fray.
9. Since both matters relate to the same impugned judgment, this Court deems it convenient and expedient to take up both matters together and to pass a common judgment.
10. What is seen from the grounds laid down in the respective appeals, it is understood that the main issue raised by the parties is with regard to the determination of the quantum of award, the appellant in MAC App. No. 5 of 2018 contending that the award is less than what was actually entitled to by the appellant/claimant and the cross-appellant/Insurance Co. contending that the award was wrongly calculated and is on the higher side which is not due by the appellant/claimant at all.
11. Heard Mr. R. Kar, learned counsel for the appellant who has submitted that the learned Tribunal has gravely erred in passing the impugned Order dated 09.04.2018 particularly while assessing the income of the deceased at Rs. 10,000/- per month without taking into consideration the fact that the deceased during his lifetime was a Class II Contractor which fact have been proved in evidence by the Claimant and as such, the claim of the Claimant/appellant for an amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees twenty five lakhs) together with interest of 9% is just compensation.
12. On the grounds taken up by the cross-appellant that the monthly income of the deceased should be calculated at Rs. 5000/- as the deceased was not having a fixed monthly income and that the
Chandrakanta Tiwari vs. New India Assurance Company Limited & Anr: (2020) 7 SCC 386
Hem Raj vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd
Kaushnuma Begum (Smt) & Ors vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors: (2001) 2 SCC 9
Kirti & Anr. Etc vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd: AIR 2021 SC 353
National Insurance Co Ltd vs. Pranay Sethi
R.D. Hattangadi vs. Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors: (1995) 1 SCC 551
Sunita Tokas vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Syed Basheer Ahamed & Ors vs. Mohammed Jameel & Anr: (2009) 2 SCC 225
AI
The court's decision emphasized the importance of accurately determining the deceased's income, future prospects, and personal expenses in awarding compensation for motor vehicle accidents.
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just, fair, and reasonable, considering future prospects and qualifications of the deceased.
The appropriate income, future prospects, and multiplier for calculating compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act were determined based on legal principles established in previous cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles from Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma for the calculation of compensation under various heads in fatal accident cases.
Compensation can exceed the amount claimed if justified by evidence; the appropriate multiplier for dependents and deductions should adhere to established guidelines.
(1) Death in motor accident – While calculating compensation, Court should take into consideration not only actual income at the time of death but should also make additions by taking note of future ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on oral testimony to determine the deceased's income and the application of established legal principles to modify the compensation am....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.