SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Megh) 318

W. DIENGDOH
Sakirul Miah – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. S. Siddiqui, Sr. Adv, with Ms. M.K. Sah, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. R. Gurung, GA, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Matter taken up via video conferencing.

2. Heard learned Sr. Counsel Mr. A. S. Siddiqui along with Ms. M.K. Sah learned counsel who has submitted that the petitioner on being apprehensive of imminent arrest in connection with Ampati Women PS Case No. 20(11)2021 under section 3(a)/4 of POCSO Act r/w section 447 IPC has approached this Court by way of this application under section 438 Cr.PC for grant of pre-arrest bail.

3. The petitioner's version is that he is a carpenter by profession and has a partner Shri Monzil Miah of the same village that is Nayapara. In course of their business relation, the petitioner made an allegation that Shri Monzil Miah had mis-appropriated his profit share of the business and when he went to his house (Monzil Miah) requesting for payment, the said Monzil Miah along with his wife and other persons locked him in a room. Somehow, the petitioner managed to flee from there.

4. To the surprise of the petitioner, he later learnt that the wife of Monzil Miah had lodged an FIR on 22.11.2021 alleging that he had trespass into the house and had gone to the room of his minor daughter and had sexually assaulted her.

5. The learned Sr. Counsel has further su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top