SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Megh) 17

W. DIENGDOH
Seiborlang Syiem – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R. Gurung, Ga., for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. S. Kumar learned counsel for the petitioners who has submitted that admittedly the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.3 were involved in a love relationship and in the process thereof, the couple got involved in a consensual sexual relationship resulting in the petitioner No.3 the alleged victim girl becoming pregnant.

2. As a matter of course, the petitioner No.3 visited the Tirot Sing Memorial Hospital, Mairang in the then West Khasi Hills District and after being examined by the Medical and Health Officer present in the hospital, she subsequently gave birth to a child on 06.11.2019. The petitioner No.3 was about 17 years old at that point of time which fact was reported to the Officer-In-Charge Mairang Police Station by the Medical and Health Officer of the said hospital. On receipt of the said information, a police SubInspector lodged a formal FIR before the Officer-In-Charge Mairang Police Station implicating the petitioner No.1 as the one who has impregnated the petitioner No.3 who was a minor at that point of time.

3. As a matter of course, a criminal case was registered being Mairang PS Case No. 50(11)2019 under Section 3 (a)/4 of the POCSO Act. In course of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top