SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Megh) 17

W. DIENGDOH
Seiborlang Syiem – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R. Gurung, Ga., for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. facts of consensual relationship leading to pregnancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. statements from involved parties indicate mutual intentions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments about the implications of pocso act and societal context. (Para 7 , 8)
4. precedential cases addressing similar circumstances. (Para 9 , 10)
5. government acknowledges prior relief granted in similar cases. (Para 11 , 12)
6. court's analysis on relationship, maturity, and legal empowerment of parties. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
7. conclusion to quash proceedings due to consent and maturity. (Para 16 , 17)

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. S. Kumar learned counsel for the petitioners who has submitted that admittedly the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.3 were involved in a love relationship and in the process thereof, the couple got involved in a consensual sexual relationship resulting in the petitioner No.3 the alleged victim girl becoming pregnant.

2. As a matter of course, the petitioner No.3 visited the Tirot Sing Memorial Hospital, Mairang in the then West Khasi Hills District and after being examined by the Medical and Health Officer present in the hospital, she subsequently gave birth to a child on 06.11.2019. The petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top