SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Megh) 37

W. DIENGDOH
Skolbha Lamare – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.P. Kharsahnoh.
For the Respondent: A.H. Kharwanlang.

Table of Content
1. background of the case involving a minor. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners’ reconciliation and relationship acknowledgment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. request for quashing the proceeding. (Para 5 , 6)
4. analysis of mutual consent and legal implications. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court’s order to quash fir and proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

W. DIENGDOH, J.

1. This is a case where apparently a love relationship between a young couple has proceeded to the extent that they have indulged in a physical relationship, as a result of which the girl who is admittedly a minor being about 16 years old or so at the relevant time, became pregnant and has subsequently delivered a child out of the said relationship with the petitioner No. 1 herein. The said relationship took a turn for the worse, inasmuch as, the petitioner No. 1 has initially refused to recognize his relationship with the alleged victim girl and the petitioner No. 2 who is the father of the victim, out of anger at the conduct of the petitioner No. 1, lodged a First Information Report on 21.11.2022 before the Officer-in-Charge, Ummulong Beat House, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.

2. Investigation then commenced on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top