SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Megh) 24

W. DIENGDOH
Honil Marak – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Deb, Advocate, Mr. B. Bhattacharjee, AAG, with Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. P.P, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioners who has submitted that this is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Williamnagar Women P.S. Case No. 16(08) of 2020 under Sections 5 /6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 wherein the petitioner No. 1 is the father of the victim girl and the petitioner No. 2 is the accused.

2. The learned counsel has further submitted that in the year 2014, the petitioner No. 2 got married to the aunt of the victim girl but there was no issue out of the said marriage.

3. In the year 2019, the mother of the victim girl fell ill and was paralyzed which led the victim to visit the residence of her aunt and grandparents, which is also the residence of the petitioner No. 2. After a few visits, the said victim girl and the petitioner No. 2 developed romantic feelings for each other and being desirous of getting married, the wife of the petitioner No. 2 was informed of such decision to which she did not object.

4. At this juncture, the learned counsel has submitted that in the Garo community, it is customary for a man to marry more than one wife, in many cases, apart from being married to his wife, he may h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top