IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
W. Diengdoh, J.
Smti. Wanphai Masharing - Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya & Ors. - Respondents
B.A. No. 21 of 2024
Decided On : 11-06-2024
Bail - POCSO Act - Sections 354, 376, 3, 4 - The court interpreted the provisions of the POCSO Act and IPC, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of consent in cases involving adolescents, ultimately granting bail based on the nature of the relationship and the absence of tampering risks.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was arrested for alleged sexual assault based on a survivor's complaint. The survivor later revealed a consensual relationship with the accused, leading to questions about the nature of the charges under the POCSO Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the relationship between the accused and the survivor was consensual, and the accused had been in custody for over a year without the possibility of tampering with evidence.
Issues: Whether the accused should be granted bail considering the nature of the relationship and the charges under the POCSO Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the interpretation of consent in cases involving adolescents must consider the context of their relationship, and that the POCSO Act should not criminalize consensual acts between young individuals.
Result: Bail granted to the accused with specific conditions.
ORDER (ORAL)
W. Diengdoh, J. - This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C made with a prayer for grant of bail to the accused person Shri. Pynskhemborlang Masharing connected with Special POCSO Case No. 20 of 2023 under Section 354, 354B, 361, 363, 376(1), 375(2)(j), IPC read with Section 3(a)/4/7/8 of the POCSO Act pending before the court of the learned Special Judge, (POCSO), Nongpoh, Ri Bhoi District.
2. Heard Mr. L. Syiem, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that on the basis of an FIR dated 23.05.2023 filed by the respondent No. 2 the accused person in question was arrested in connection with Women PS Case No. 29(05) of 2023 under Section 354(A)(i)/376(1) IPC read with Section 3(a)/4 POCSO Act, 2012.
3. The learned counsel has also submitted that the background facts leading to the arrest of the accused person in question was based on the statement of the survivor who had narrated to her mother, the respondent No. 2 herein about an incident which occurred sometime in the month of December 2022, where she was allegedly sexually assaulted by one person named Raymond Nongkhlaw. The survivor has further stated that in the month of March 2023 she had a love relationship with the accused person in question that is, Pynskhemborlang Masharing and was involved in sexual intercourse with him.
4. The fact that such incident of sexual relationship had happened was revealed only when the survivor had complained of stomach ache following which her mother took her to the hospital whereupon on being examined by the doctor, she was found to be pregnant. Thus, on revelation of the facts as stated herein above as regard her encounter with Shri. Raymond Nongkhlaw and the accused person herein in question, the said FIR was lodged and the matter after being investigated, the accused person in question was arrested on 27.05.2023 and is still in judicial custody till date.
5. The I/O has then filed his charge sheet with a finding that the accused person in question is found to be prima facie involved in the offence of sexual assault and is accordingly made to stand trial. The stage of the case before the trial court is for recording of evidence of the witnesses, the survivor had also been examined on 08.05.2024 as PW-1.
6. The learned counsel has submitted that on perusal of the statement of the survivor as well as her deposition before the trial court, what is evident is that though prima facie the act of sexual intercourse between the two can be assumed to have taken place, however the survivor has clearly stated that her relationship with the accused person in question is a love relationship, meaning that even if there had been any sexual intercourse between them, the same is consensual in nature.
7. Since the accused person in question is in custody for more than a year, the trial having commence, therefore investigation is complete, there would be no possibility of the accused person to tamper with the evidence at this stage. The fact that the accused person in question is also very young in age, his further incarceration would jeopardize his future among other things and as such, this application is preferred with a prayer for grant of bail to the accused person in question with any conditions that this Court may deem fit and proper to impose.
8. Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. P.P has submitted that on perusal of the deposition of the survivor and the materials on record, this Court may judiciously apply its discretion to decide as to whether bail ought to be granted or not.
9. This Court has taken due note of the submission made and has also perused the petition and the accompanying annexures. The copy of the deposition of the survivor which has been brought on record by way of an affidavit has also been looked into by this Court.
10. The facts and circumstances of the case are peculiar in a sense that the survivor had been allegedly subjected to sexual assault by two persons on different occasions. However, as far as the case
The court established that consensual relationships among adolescents should be carefully evaluated under the POCSO Act to avoid unjust criminalization.
The consensual nature of the act, the severity of the offence, and the discretion of the court in bail matters are crucial in determining the grant of bail.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of sexual assault, consent, and the implications of marriage under the IPC and the POCSO Act, particularly in the context of ....
The age of consent is irrelevant in bail decisions under the POCSO Act; factors such as the nature of the offence and the accused's behavior must guide discretion.
It is also a general principle of bail jurisprudence that bail and not jail should be the guiding principles for courts as the purpose of bail is to allow the accused to prepare his defence sans a ho....
Sexual Autonomy encompasses both, right to engage in wanted sexual activity and right to be protected from unwanted sexual aggression – Only when both aspects of adolescent’s rights are recognized, h....
A minor's consent is not valid for sexual intercourse, and the age of consent for sexual intercourse is definitively 18 years.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.