W. DIENGDOH
Sopiwara Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
W. DIENGDOH, J.
1. Heard Mr. S.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that the petitioner herein apprehending arrest in connection with Tura Women P.S. Case No. 36 (5) 2023 under Section 376DA/120B IPC read with Section 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 has approached this Court with an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C with a prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel has submitted that the said Tura Women P.S. Case was registered on the basis of an FIR filed on 27.05.2023 before the In-charge Jangkipara Outpost, West Garo Hills District.
3. The complainant who is the father of a minor girl aged about 15 years has alleged that on 26.05.2023 at about 2:00 pm, his minor daughter, while collecting firewood from a nearby jungle was accosted by the three accused persons named in the said FIR, who has committed the act of rape on the said minor.
4. In course of investigation, the name of the petitioner herein has also figured, inasmuch as, it was alleged that she along with her son had lured the said minor girl to the jungle and had also arranged that the three accused persons be present at the place of occurrenc
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra [(2018) 6 SCC 454]
Priya Patel v. State of M.P and another reported in (2006) 6 SCC 263
The exclusion of pre-arrest bail under Section 438(4) Cr.P.C. is not absolute; it does not apply when no prima facie case is made against the accused.
Section 438 of Cr.P.C. provides for issuing directions for granting bail to a person apprehending arrest.
The exclusion of anticipatory bail under Section 438(4) is not absolute; it applies only when a prima facie case exists and does not prevent bail in cases of patently false allegations.
Exclusion of pre-arrest bail in Section 438(4) is not absolute; courts can grant bail if no prima facie case of assault is established.
The court applied the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Sidharam Satlinggappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra to determine the grant of pre-arrest bail based on the apprehension of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of pre-arrest bail in a case involving sexual offences based on the prima facie assessment of the nature of the alleged offence.
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in serious POCSO cases without considering the prima facie evidence against the accused and the severity of the charges.
Grant of pre-arrest bail - It is well settled that though the power to grant pre-arrest bail is a discretionary power to be exercised by the Courts, however, the power cannot be exercised whimsically....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.