IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manash Ranjan Pathak, J.
Atabur Rahman S/o Late Jonab Ali - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented By The Public Prosecutor and anr. – Respondents
AB/174/2025
Decided On : 26-03-2025
ORDER :
Heard Mr. Mahammad Ali Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State, opposite party No. 1. Also heard Ms. Manisha Karen Brown, learned Amicus Curiae for the informant, opposite party No. 2.
2. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner, namely, Atabur Rahman, son of late Jonab Ali, resident of Village – Sagunbari, Police Station – Moirabari, District – Morigaon, Assam, has filed this application on 27.01.2025 under Section 482 BNSS, seeking pre-arrest in Special (POCSO) Case No. 179/2024 arising out of Dhing Police Station Case No. 162/2024 registered under Sections 61(2)/ 126(2)/137(2)/74/70(2)/109/78 BNS read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, corresponding to G.R. No. 2960/2024.
3. The Court on 30.01.2025 called for the scanned copy of said Special (POCSO) Case No. 179/2024 and also the copy of Dhing Police Station Case No. 162/2024 from the Court of learned Special Judge (POCSO) -cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Nagaon.
4. Perused the records of the case.
5. The petitioner is a charge-sheeted accused in Special (POCSO) Case No. 179/2024 arising out of Dhing P.S. Case No. 162/2024 under Sections 61(2)/126(2)/137(2)/74/70(2)/109/238 BNS read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, pending before the Court of learned Special Judge (POCSO) -cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Nagaon.
6. As per the FIR dated 22.08.2024 lodged by the informant/opposite party No. 2, Sub-Inspector of Police, Dhing Police Station before the Officer-in-Charge of Dhing Police Station, the case is that on 22.08.2024 around 06:53 PM an information was received at Dhing Police Station from a person Abhishek Kumar Das through his Mobile Phone No. 9954339015 informing that a minor girl was found lying unconscious near the roadside at Borbheti Village, the road connecting Borbheti to Bhakatgaon, Dhing near Crematorium (Shib Mandir) under Dhing Police Station and it was suspected that the victim girl was raped by some unknown miscreants. Said information was accordingly recorded as Dhing Police Station G D Entry No 384 dated 22.08.2024 and the informant along with other police personnel including lady constable proceeded to the place of occurrence.
7. On reaching the place of occurrence it was found that the victim girl was lying in the lap of a woman belonging to Borbheti Village. Looking at the condition of the victim girl she was immediately moved to Dhing FRU (First Referral Unit) for her treatment. After her preliminary treatment, the Dhing FRU referred the victim girl to the Nagaon Medical College and Hospital wherein she was accordingly admitted for treatment.
8. In the place of occurrence, two young boys, Dipankar Nath and Surajit Nath of Borbheti Village were the first to witness and found the victim girl in a traumatized state and those two boys on questioning the victim girl could came to know that three miscreants conspired and followed her from the institution wherein she was taking tuition classes and when she reached the place of occurrence she was wrongfully restrained and was dragged to a roadside bush and they raped her. One of the miscreants had hold her hands, another put a handkerchief in her mouth so that she could not scream and the other miscreants pull down her pant and inner garments and committed rape on her. The miscreants also attempted to kill her in order to hide their identities, but could not do it because of the passing vehicles and as the miscreants got frightened, they fled away in the motorcycle.
9. The said information was given to those two boys by the victim herself, which they got it recorded in their mobile phones that was given with the said FIR.
10. As the victim girl was in the hospital for her treatment for which she was unable to lodge the FIR, in the interest of the investigation, the complainant opposite party No. 2 lodged the FIR so that the process of investigation starts without undue delay. Accordingly, the said FIR was lodged against the unknow
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in serious POCSO cases without considering the prima facie evidence against the accused and the severity of the charges.
Pre-arrest bail denied in serious offences of abduction, assault and robbery where petitioners named by co-accused, custodial interrogation needed for ongoing investigation with recoveries pending, a....
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy, granted sparingly in serious cases, and requires compliance with court conditions; failure to do so can lead to rejection of bail applications.
The exclusion of pre-arrest bail under Section 438(4) Cr.P.C. is not absolute; it does not apply when no prima facie case is made against the accused.
Pre-arrest bail is a privilege, not a right, and must be granted only in exceptional circumstances, considering the gravity of accusations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.