Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
H.S. THANGKHIEW
Bamang Nabam – Appellant
Versus
North Eastern Hills University (NEHU) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to condone attendance shortfall (Para 1) |
| 2. legitimate reasons for absence presented (Para 2) |
| 3. rules of legal education restrict attendance condonation (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. rule 12 governs eligibility for end semester test (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. court denies relief due to mandatory rules (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
H.S. THANGKHIEW, J.
1. The petitioner who is stated to be a Student in the 5th Semester of Shillong Law College is before this Court seeking interference by invoking powers under Article 226 of the Constitution, to condone the shortfall in attendance for which he has been held ineligible by the College to take the End Semester Exams (5th semester Exams).
2. Mr. P. Yobin, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the failure of the petitioner/student to meet the required attendance was because of legitimate reasons i.e. medical conditions, for which he had undergone an operation in November, 2024, and a medical certificate and the other details to this effect have been annexed to the writ petition. He further submits that the reasons being genuine, the petitioner who is an exceptional student without any back paper till date, be given some consid
Academic institutions must adhere strictly to attendance regulations as established by legal education rules, allowing discretion only within the specified limits.
The Court upheld the necessity of minimum attendance requirements for examinations in educational institutions, emphasizing the impact on academic integrity.
The Head of Institution must forward applications for attendance condonation to the Controller of Examinations; summary rejection is unjustified.
Mandatory attendance regulations must be uniformly enforced, and compassion cannot override statutory requirements. Claims of discriminatory treatment require substantial evidence to succeed.
Legal education standards must be upheld, allowing for exceptions in legitimate medical cases, while reevaluating rigid attendance policies for the welfare of students.
A student's disciplinary conduct and fulfillment of attendance requirements do not warrant relief under equitable jurisdiction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
