Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
B. BHATTACHARJEE
Subbayan Nagarajan S/o Late Shri Karuppya Nagarajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitions and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against the fir's validity (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of fir's plausibility (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. legal reasoning for quashing fir (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion and order to quash fir (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
B. BHATTACHARJEE, J.
1. This set of two criminal petitions has been filed challenging the FIR No. 0248/2023 dated 11-09-2023 by raising common ground and identical prayers have been made in both the petitions. Hence, both the criminal petitions are taken up together and disposed of by a common order.
1.1 Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Abhishek K. Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in Crl. Petn. No. 61 of 2024. Mr. S.P. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Lyngdoh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in Crl. Petn. No. 60 of 2024 has adopted the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel in Crl. Petn. No. 61 of 2024. Also heard Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Mr. E.R. Chyne, learned GA, appearing for the State-respondent in both the cases.
2. The petitioners in both the criminal petitions are engaged in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
