Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
B. BHATTACHARJEE
Shillong Muslim Union – Appellant
Versus
Md. Munshi Ali Sonari @ Munna Ali (Since Deceased) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. S. Pandit, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr. N. Syngkon, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1.
2. None appeared for the respondent Nos. 2 – 3 despite service of notice upon them.
3. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 29.07.2024, passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Shillong in Title Execution Case No.1 (H) of 2024 by which the proceeding of the execution case was stayed until further order.
4. The Title Suit No. 35 (H) of 2014 was filed by the petitioner seeking eviction of the respondents from the suit premises. The suit was dismissed on 24.11.2021. An appeal vide T.C.A. No. 1 (H) of 2021 was preferred against the order of dismissal and the learned Appellate Court decreed the suit in favor of the petitioner by judgment and decree dated 02.05.2024. As the respondents did not vacate the suit premises, the petitioner filed the Execution Case No. 1 (H) of 2024 before the executing court and the order dated 09.07.2024 was passed allowing the execution of the decree and the petitioner was directed to take necessary steps. In the meantime, the respondents herein filed an applic
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
