N.KOTISWAR SINGH
Sharmila Naorem – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
N. Kotiswar Singh, J.
1. Heard Mr. H.S. Paonam, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.S. Reisang, learned Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondents, Mr. A. Jagatchandra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, Mr. Md. Jalaluddin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 and Mr. Ch. Momon, learned counsel for respondents No. 7 and 8 respectively.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 02.03.2009 and 28.02.2009 by which the respondent No. 4 and another were appointed as Project Officers on contract basis and the respondent No. 5 promoted to the post of Project Officer respectively in the District Rural Development Agency, Imphal West.
3. The facts in brief and main contentions of the petitioner may be stated as follows.
An advertisement was issued on 14.12.2007 for appointment to several posts including three posts of Project Officers for the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Imphal West under the Rural Development Department (Monitoring Cell), Government of Manipur. As per the said advertisement, the following educational qualifications and requir
Bedanga Talukdar vs. Saifudaullah Khan & Ors.
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others -Vs.- Umadevi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.