SANJAY KUMAR
Andy Mangsatabam – Appellant
Versus
Annie Mangsatabam – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1.The Assistant Survey and Settlement Officer, Imphal West-I, passed order dated 27.12.2005 in Mutation Case No.449/AS & SO -IW-I of 2005, accepting the plea of Annie Mangsatabam that she had acquired absolute right and title, by way of inheritance from late Mangsatabam (Ongbi) Punyabati Devi, her mother, and mutated her name in the revenue records as against the homestead land admeasuring 0.0498 hectares, covered by CS Dag No 2164 under Patta No.90/1052 equivalent to Patta No.90/158/63/503(New) of Village No.90-Thangmeiband, Imphal West District, Manipur.
Andy Mangsatabam and Rarry Mangsatabam, being two of the brothers of Annie Mangsatabam, approached the Revenue Tribunal, Manipur at Lamphelpat, aggrieved by the aforestated Mutation Order dated 27.12.2005. As there was a long delay of 5715 days on their part in doing so, they filed Revenue Miscellaneous (Revenue Petition) Case No.52 of 2021 seeking condonation of the said delay in filing a revision against the Mutation Order dated 27.12.2005. By judgment and order dated 18.04.2022, the Tribunal refused to condone the delay and rejected their application. Aggrieved thereby, Andy Mangsatabam filed CRP No.18 of 2022 while Rar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.