IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Ngathem Sudhir Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Manipur & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 541 of 2021 & WP(C) No. 1 of 2022
Decided On : 11-05-2022
PENSIONARY BENEFITS - Delayed Payment - MCS (Pension) Rules, 1977 - Interest - [Rule 54(6) of the MCS (Pension) Rules, 1977] - The court directed the respondents to finalize the pension paper of the petitioner within four weeks and ordered an interest of 9% per annum if the pension and other retiral benefits are not paid within the stipulated period.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for the payment of pension and other retiral benefits. The retirement order was issued, but the payment of pensionary benefits was delayed. The petitioner was compelled to live in penury and had to borrow money to maintain his family.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no disciplinary proceeding pending against the petitioner and that the entitled retirement benefits should be released without delay. The court also noted the negligence of the respondent authorities in settling the retiral and pensionary benefits.
Issues: Delay in payment of pensionary benefits, negligence of respondent authorities, entitlement to retirement benefits.
Ratio Decidendi: The pension and other retiral benefits are valuable rights and property in the hands of the government servants. Any delay in settlement and disbursement should be viewed seriously, and heavy interest may be imposed. The court directed the respondents to finalize the pension paper of the petitioner within a time-bound manner and ordered an interest of 9% per annum if the pension and other retiral benefits are not paid within the stipulated period.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed W.P.(C) No.541 of 2021, allowed W.P.(C) No.1 of 2022, set aside the impugned portion of the order dated 22.12.2021, and directed the respondents to finalize the pension paper of the petitioner within a period of four weeks. If the pension and other retiral benefits are not paid within the stipulated period, it shall carry an interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
JUDGMENT
1. W.P. (C) No.541 of 2021 has been filed by the seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take immediate necessary steps for payment of petitioner's pension and other retiral benefits within a time frame and also to direct the second respondent to immediately issue the retirement order of the petitioner.
2. W.P.(C) No.1 of 2022 has been filed to direct the respondents to give the petitioner interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the amount of petitioner's retiral/terminal benefits, including retirement gratuity for the period from the due date till the date of actual payment and to quash the second sentence appeared at paragraph 6 of the order dated 22.12.2021.
3. Since the issue involved in both the petitions is one and the same, they were heard together and disposed of by this common order.
4. Heard Mr. Ng. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs. Ch. Sundari, the learned Government Advocate for the respondent State and Mr. I. Somorjit, learned junior counsel to Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned Sr. PCCG for the respondent Accountant General.
5. Mr. Ng. Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of W.P.(C) No.541 of 2021, on 22.12.2021, the Joint Secretary, Education (S), Government of Manipur issued an order allowing the petitioner to retire from service with effect from 28.2.2021 on attaining the age of superannuation. Thus, the only prayer now pending consideration in W.P.(C) No.541 of 2021 is payment of petitioner's pensionary benefits and other retiral benefits.
6. Mr. H. Samarjit, the learned Government Advocate for the respondent State also submitted that the retirement order in respect of the petitioner was issued on 22.12.2021 with effect from 28.2.2021 pursuant to the report of the Director of Education (S), Manipur.
7. In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the prayer for issuance of the retirement order was satisfied by issuance of the order dated 22.12.2021 allowing the petitioner to retire from service with effect from 28.2.2021.
8. Insofar as the prayer for payment of petitioner's pensionary benefits and other retiral benefits, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not occupy any Government accommodation nor was there any outstanding dues whatsoever against him and there is also no departmental enquiry pending against him. However, the respondents have not taken steps to settle the pension and other retiral benefits till now quite arbitrarily. He would submit that already more than a year elapsed from his date of retirement, but not a single rupee of his monetary/retiral benefits like pension, gratuity, leave encashment, GPF, Group Insurance etc. have been given to the petitioner. The petitioner is the head and also the only earning member of his family which consists of five members and his monthly salary is the only source of income.
9. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has been compelled literally to become a beggar running from pillar to post for borrowing money from his relatives and friends for maintaining his family, especially during hard times of Covid-19 pandemic and the petitioner is put to very precarious condition.
10. The learned counsel urged that it is a matter of great pity and disgrace that the petitioner after rendering service for about 33 years as a teacher is compelled to live in penury. The Hon'ble Apex Court time and again held that pension and gratuity are no longer matters of any bounty to be distributed by Government, but are valuable rights and property in their hands and any delay in settlement and disbursement whereof should be viewed seriously and dealt with severely by imposing penalty in the form of interest. In this case, admittedly, there is a delay in disbursement of pensionary and other monetary benefits and therefore, this Court while directing the respondents to disburse the entitled retirement benefits may order interest at the rate o
The pension and other retiral benefits are valuable rights and property in the hands of the government servants. Any delay in settlement and disbursement should be viewed seriously, and heavy interes....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the petitioner's right to timely pension and retirement benefits, and the State Government's obligation to ensure prompt payment of retirement d....
Pension is a constitutional right and cannot be withheld without lawful authority; delays in payment warrant interest.
The court established that retirees are entitled to interest on delayed pension payments when the delay is not attributable to their actions, reinforcing the principle that pension is a right earned ....
Point of Law - Service Matter – Benefits of Pension Right of the petitioner to claim the pensionary benefits alive in any other proceedings which may be initiated by the petitioner at the appropriate....
The High Court may issue a direction to administrative authorities to consider and dispose of pending representations regarding terminal benefits within a fixed timeframe when such benefits remain un....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.