SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 67

AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Abdul Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. M. Devananda, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. S. Suresh, ASG, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

[1] Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. S. Suresh, learned ASG appearing for the respondents.

[2] The petitioners in the present two writ petitions are personnels of the C.R.P.F and they have filed the present two writ petitions assailing the order dated 31.01.2019, signals dated 13.02.2019, 28.02.2019 and 11.03.2019 effecting their transfer and posting from Group Centre (G.C), CRPF Langjing, Imphal, Manipur (hereinafter referred to as G.C., Imphal for short) to 132 Bn. and 35Bn. respectively, which are located at Jammu & Kashmir.

As the question of facts and law involved in the present two writ petitions are similar, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

[3] Mr. M. Devananda, learned counsel for the petitioners raised the following three grounds in assailing the impugned orders and signals:-

(i) the impugned transfer order have been issued in violation of the transfer policy as contained in Para 4(ix) of the standing order No. 07/2015 dated 04.08.2015, inasmuch as, the petitioners have been subjected to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top