AJIT KUMAR
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mohd. Atif, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for all the respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of this petition has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 09.06.2022 whereby he has been transferred to Airport of Bhuvaneshwar from Airport of Varanasi while working as Sub-Inspector in Central Industrial Security Force (CISF).
3. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order for the reason that he has served for more that 11 years and 6 months out of home sector and as per their own policy of transfer and adjustment promulgated by the respondents, petitioner was entitled to be given posting in home sector. Learned counsel has also assailed the order on the ground that once he has been given posting in his home sector at Varanasi in the year 2018 after having served out at places of posting out of home sector, he could not have been declared as surplus staff to be adjusted at a different place out of his home sector. It is submitted that the persons junior to him were adjusted within the home sector by placing them from Varanasi to Patna. He i
Dr. Amarjit Singh Ahluwalia v. The State of Punjab: (1975) 3 SCC 503
Dharmendra Kumar Saxena vs. State of Uttar Pradesh And others: 2013 (7) ADJ 153
Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors. vs. Durgesh Kuwar
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India and others: (1979) 3 SCC 489
Somesh Tiwari vs. Union of India: (2009) 2 SCC 592
S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India
Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Another (AIR 1967 SC 1910)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.