SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 88

M. V. MURALIDARAN
Md. Nasib Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N. Jotendro, Sr. Advocate, for the Petitioners; Mr. Shyam Sharma, GA, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the suspension order dated 25.9.2012 issued by the second respondent.

[2] Heard Mr. N. Jotendra, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam, learned Government Advocate.

[3] The case of the petitioner is that while he was working as Barkandaz in Electrical Division No.1, PWD, Manipur, the petitioner was placed under suspension by an order dated 25.9.2012 of the second respondent under Rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 in connection with FIR No.138(8)2012 registered under Sections 468, 471 and 420 IPC. According to the petitioner, the said FIR was registered in connection with a complaint dated 27.8.2012 lodged by the then Superintending Engineer, Electrical Circle, PWD, Manipur for the alleged withdrawal of Rs.5,39,174/- fraudulently from the Account No.32178814953 of State Bank of India, Manipur University Branch by using forged office orders, certificates, bill vouchers and other fake documents in the name of one fictitious person namely Keisham Biren Singh, S.O., Grade-I as provisional gratuity i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top