IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Lanusungkum Jamir, J.
Nezone Pipes & Structures & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Manipur & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) Nos. 427, 454 & 490 of 2021
Decided On : 16-08-2021
TENDER - PROCUREMENT OF GI PIPES - [Section-II, C 2, Appendix-4, Appendix-6, Sl.No.3, 4, 6 of Clause A.1 under Section-III] - The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the petitioner's firm in the technical bid for procurement of GI Pipes. The rejection was found to be based on the documents furnished by the petitioner and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the NIT dated 26.03.2021. The court held that the decision-making process was reasonable and not arbitrary, and the official respondents had the power to seek clarification from the bidders as per the NIT. The court emphasized that it cannot substitute its opinion for the authority's decision in a commercial transaction and that the decision-making process can be subject to judicial review.
JUDGMENT
The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Government of Manipur issued Invitation For Bids vide NIT No.CE/PHE/2P(R)/2021/4354 dated 26.03.2021 inviting online rate quotation from reputed manufacturers of G.I Pipe (Class Medium/Heavy) having necessary valid ISI Certificate or BIS license for procurement of GI Pipes, Class Medium/Heavy (Supply, delivery and stacking of GI Pipes) F.O.R. Imphal, Manipur.
Para 7 of the Invitation For Bids dated 26.03.2021 provided that bids must be submitted online w.e.f. 15.00 Hrs of 26.03.2021 and shall be accepted upto 12.00 Hrs of 21.04.2021 and Technical Bids will be opened at 13.00 Hrs of 21.04.2021 and opening of Financial Bids (for Technically qualified bidders only) will be notified later.
2. The petitioner firm being eligible and qualified submitted its bid on 20.04.2021 under Bid No.4523. Similarly, the respondent No.4, M/s BST Infratech Limited, respondent No.5, M/s Vishal Pipes Limited and Swastik Pipes Limited also submitted their bids against the Invitation For Bids dated 26.03.2021.
3. On 21.04.2021, the Chief Engineer, PHED, Government of Manipur issued an Office Memorandum indicating that the Technical Bid for procurement of GI Pipe, class Medium/Heavy, (Supply, delivery and stacking of GI Pipes) F.O.R Imphal, Manipur has been opened by the Tender Opening Committee and is under evaluation. Thereafter, another Office Memorandum dated 5.5.2021 was issued by the Chief Engineer (PHED), Government of Manipur stating that consequent upon the evaluation of Technical Bid by the e-tender Opening and Evaluation Committee, the Financial Bid for the technically qualified bidders of the e-tender for “Procurement of GI Pipes, class Medium/Heavy (supply, delivery and stacking) of GI Pipes, F.O.R, Imphal, Manipur” will be opened on 6.5.2021 at 11.30 AM.
4. A letter dated 5.5.2021 was also sent to the petitioner’s firm by email informing that the petitioner’s bid for the tender has been rejected during Technical evaluation by the duly constituted committee for the reason Technically not qualified. The petitioner’s firm thereafter wrote a letter dated 6.5.2021 by email to the concerned authority requesting to clarify the specific reason for the rejection of the petitioner’s bid for Tender ID:2021_PHED_1337_1 at the earliest. However, the petitioner’s firm did not receive any reply to the said request.
5. Being aggrieved, the petitioner approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.410 of 2021 with the following prayers:
“i. to quash and set aside the Self-generated Email or Official letter dated 05.05.2021 (Annexure A/6) addressed to the petitioner’s firm/Tender ID received by the petitioner’s firm via e-mail, to do justice;
ii) to direct the respondents/authorities to process, perform and conduct such tender matter as per the instructions, terms and conditions of the Notification/Invitation for Bids dated 26.03.2021 under NIT CE/PHE/2P(R)/2021/4354. In other words, to abide by the terms and conditions of the tender process;
iii) to direct the respondents/authorities to award the work contract as per the applicable terms and conditions of the Notification/Invitation For Bids dated 26.03.2021 under NIT CE/PHE/2P(R)/2021/4354 to do justice;
iv) to call for the relevant files or records which are under the custody of the respondents;
v) in the interim to direct the respondents not to proceed with the tender process in connection with the Notification/Invitation For Bids dated 26.03.2021 under NIT CE/PHE/2P(R)/2021/4354 and not to give effect to the Self-generated Email or Official letter dated 05.05.2021 during the pendency of the present writ petitions; Or in case, to stay the execution of work in pursuance to such Notification/Invitation for Bids dated 26.03.2021;
vi) to pass any appropriate order (s) or direction (s) which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the na
AIR India Ltd vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd & Ors (2000) 2 SCC 617
Central Coalfields Ltd & Anr vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) & Ors (2016) 8 SCC 622
Jagdish Mandal vs. State of Orissa & Ors (2007) 14 SCC 517
Master Marine Services (P) Ltc vs. Metcalfe & Hodkinson (P) Ltd & Anr (2005) 6 SCC 138
Meerut Development Authority vs. Association of Management Studies & Anr (2009) 6 SCC 171
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd vs. State of Karnataka : (2012) 8 SCC 216
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs. The Chief Election Commissioner
Montecarlo Ltd vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (2016) 15 SCC 272
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. International Airport Authority of India : (1979) 3 SCC 489
Rashmi Metaliks Limited & Anr vs. Kolkata Metropolitan Dev Authority & Ors (2013) 10 SCC 95
Reliance Telecom Ltd & Anr vs. Union of India & Anr (2017) 4 SCC 269
Sterling Computers Ltd vs. M&N Publications Ltd (1993) 1 SCC 445
AI
The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's firm in the technical bid for procurement of GI Pipes, emphasizing that the decision-making process was reasonable and not arbitrary, and that the c....
Compliance with bidding conditions, specifically the demonstration of minimum average turnover, is crucial for the acceptance of bids in public procurement processes.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
The court upheld the authority's discretion in evaluating tender bids, emphasizing the need for compliance with mandatory conditions and the absence of arbitrariness in disqualification decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.