SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 541

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ARINDAM MUKHEREJEE, J.
Sonarpur Progotir Pathe & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A 4598 of 2021
Decided On : 26-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajmohan Chattoraj, Mr. Sankar Prasad Dalapati, Mr. Subrata Sarkar, Mr. Saurav Mondal, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Samrat Sen, Mr. Sutapa Sanyal, Mr. Siva Prasad Ghosh.

Headnote:

Evaluation process – Sought for cancellation of a letter – Held, Hon’ble Supreme Court has after considering several authorities, holding field of judicial review in case of awarding of Government largesse has concurred with views expressed in various judgments considered therein as regards parameters laid down for judicial review in respect of awarding government contract through tender process – Even in very recent judgment reported ratio laid down in earlier judgments have not been departed from Controversy sought to be raised by petitioners tested on touchstone of parameters of judicial review laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court persuades this Court to hold that judicial review is not warranted in case at hand – Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.) :

1. The petitioner no.1, a registered society as claimed and the petitioner no.2 its President have, inter alia, sought for cancellation of a letter dated 2nd February, 2021 issued by the Chief Medical Officer Health, Murshidabad (respondent no.3) to respondent no.5 (Anjana Ghosh Memorial Social Welfare Trust) informing the said respondent to have been selected as the lowest bidder on the ground that the bid of the respondent no.5 was mandatorily required to be rejected.

Facts of the Case :

1. The Chief Medical Officer of Health, Berhampore, Murshidabad, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of West Bengal had published a notice inviting e-Tender inviting offers from eligible bidders for establishment of Waiting Hut for Pregnant Women at Teghari BPHC, Mahesail BPHC, Saktipur BPHC & Beniagram PHC (Farakka) in Murshidabad district of the State for 3 years from the date of award of the contract (hereinafter referred to as said NIT).

2. The bids for the said NIT were required to be submitted in three parts ‘Bid – A’, ‘Bid – B’ and ‘Bid – C’. ‘Bid – A’ and ‘Bid – B’ constitute the technical bid and ‘Bid – C’ is the Bill of Quality (in short BOQ) being the Financial Bid.

3. Under the evaluation process, the technical bid being ‘Bid-A’ and ‘Bid-B’ were to be evaluated first. Those bidders who qualified in respect of evaluation of essential and other requirements of ‘Bid – A’ and ‘Bid-B’ and their supporting documents being in conformity were entitled to have their Financial Bid (‘Bid-C’) opened and evaluated.

4. The detailed list of documents to be attached to the Bid was mentioned in the check list at the end of the bid documents of the NIT.

5. The NIT also provided certain guidelines for the evaluation process which are as follows:-

    “a) Any wrong or misleading information provided by the Tenderer during submission of bids may lead to summary cancellation of bid, blacklisting in DH&FWS for at least 5 years and forfeiture of EMD.

b) Each scanned documents should have an index page indicating the name of the documents enclosed with page no.

c) The EMD of unsuccessful Tenderers shall be returned as promptly as possible upon the successful Tenderer’s furnishing of the Performance Security pursuant to Instructions to Tenderers.

d) In case extension required, Bank Guarantees are to be renewed prior to 30 days of their expiry.”.

6. The NIT also provided for following under eligibility criteria:-

    “3. The Selection committee can call for any further clarifications or information or documents at any point of time. The applicant may also be called for explaining or clarifying issues, if there by any.

4. The Selection committee, at its own discretion, will evaluate the performance of Self Help Groups to be qualified.”.

7. The selection process as mentioned under the NIT is as follows:-

    “c. Selection Process of Applicants

1. Selection process would involve short-listing of applicants based on eligibility criteria. It may be mentioned here that an Organization may be considered for operation and management of more than one Waiting Hut, if selected. However, the Organizations need to make separate applications for each of the Waiting Huts.

2. After short-listing of applicants as mentioned above, final selection of the Organization from the short-listed applicants would be made on the lowest offer made by an applicant for financial grant in the application for Operation and Management of the Waiting Hut through PPP on Monthly basis.

3. The Selection Committee can call for any further clarifications or information or documents at any point of time. The applicant may also be called for explaining or clarifying issues, if there be any.

4. The Selection Committee, at its own discretion, will evaluate the performance of Self Help Groups to be qualified.

5. Decision of the Selection Committee regarding selection of the Organization for operation and maintenance of the three Waiting Huts will be final.

6. Tender In

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top