SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 53

M. V. MURALIDARAN
Johnson Arokiadass – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Golly, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. H. Samarjit, PP, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

This application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge him on bail in connection with FIR No.24(4)2021 of Moreh Police Station registered under Section 11(iv)(v)/18 of POCSO Act.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 17.4.2021 at 9.00 a.m., the complainant Harbajan Kaur lodged a written complaint to the Officer-in-Charge of Moreh Police Station stating that on 5.4.2021, her daughter was mentally harassed by the petitioner with sexual intention and asked her to send pictures late at night through mobile phone. The petitioner also blackmailed the daughter of the complainant and asked her to meet privately, failing which he would come to her residence and expose her relation with her boyfriend. Further case of the prosecution is that the petitioner came to the house of the complainant thrice on 5.4.2021, 6.4.2021 and 14.4.2021 asking why her daughter blocked his number. While visiting the house of the victim, the petitioner also threatened the victim regarding her education, as she is one of the sponsored students under VSR Trust Foundation and further threatened to discontinue her sponsorship.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top