IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Alan Famhoite - Appellant
Versus
Officer-in-charge Of The Churachandpur Police Station - Respondent
Bail Appln. No. 21 of 2022
Decided On : 04-11-2022
Bail - Criminal Law - Section 302 IPC - 439 Cr.P.C.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.66(05)2022 under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, as the S/s Defence Secretary of Hmar Peoples Convention (D), GHQ (HPC), was involved in the murder of Vanramlal. The petitioner denied the allegations and claimed innocence, stating that the complaint was based on hearsay and that he was falsely implicated due to post-election rivalry.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the delay in lodging the complaint, the nature of the allegations, and the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. The court found that the delay in lodging the complaint was disturbing, but the reasons given by the petitioner for the delay were not convincing. The court noted that the allegations were based on oral and documentary evidence to be adduced by the prosecution and that the involvement of the petitioner had not been established at this stage.
Issues: The issues revolved around the delay in lodging the complaint, the nature of the allegations, and the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the grant of bail depends on the nature of the offence, the severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused absconding or tampering with evidence. The court also highlighted the presumption of innocence until proven guilty and the need for a humane attitude in dealing with bail applications.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application, ordering the petitioner to be enlarged on bail with specific conditions, including furnishing a personal bond, surrendering the passport, and cooperating with the investigation. The court directed the respondent police to expedite the investigation and take necessary further steps in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge him on bail in connection with FIR No.66(05)2022 under Section 302 IPC on the file of Churachandpur Police Station.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 4.5.2022, the Officer-in-Charge of Churachandpur Police Station received a written complaint from Thanglawr of Muonlhlum, Rengkai Village, Churachandpur stating that on 20.12.2021 at around 7.00 a.m., his son Vanramlal was assaulted by the petitioner and four unknown associates at a culvert in Edenthar, Rengkai near the residence of the petitioner at District Hospital, Churachandpur. However, his son was declared brought dead by the concerned Medical Officer on duty. Further, without performing any police formalities, the petitioner engaged one ambulance and dropped the dead body of his son at his residence. He has been threatened by the petitioner not to make any complaint to the police. The petitioner being S/s Defence Secretary of Hmar Peoples Convention (D), GHQ (HPC), he did not made any report to the police and conducted the funeral at Rengkai Cemetery on the date. Hence, there is a delay in lodging the complaint. Upon receipt of the complaint, the Officer-in-Charge of the Churachandpur Police Station registered an FIR bearing No.66(05)2022 under Section 302/34 IPC against the petitioner.
3. Mr. Serto T. Kom, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present FIR has been registered based on hearsay received by the complainant against the petitioner, wherein the complainant himself stated that he was informed by his wife who was called upon by one Willam Hrangate through phone that their son and his friend were beaten by the petitioner at a culvert in Edenthar without any proof. He would submit that there is no material to prove the allegation against the petitioner and that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned counsel further submitted that the complaint was made after a long delay of the alleged incident of the death of the complainant's son, which the petitioner believed to be based on some pressure made upon the complainant by some persons to see that the petitioner be in the police custody as well as in judicial custody for a long time as the alleged offence being heinous crime. The said pressure is believed to be made by the powerful supporters of certain politicians against whom the petitioner had worked during the election of the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly Election held on 5.3.2022. The petitioner being social worker and active in politics has been made as victim and it is a post-election rivalry.
5. The learned counsel next submitted that the allegations made in the complaint being concocted and that the petitioner is never a member of the organization called Hmar Peoples Convention (Democratic). The learned counsel submitted that there is no any material to substantiate the allegations against the petitioner, nor is there any witness to prove the allegations against the petitioner and that there is no prima facie case is made out. He submits that earlier, the petitioner filed Cril. Misc. (B) Case No.12 of 2022 before the learned Special Judge, ND&PS, Churachandpur and by the order dated 11.7.2022, the learned Special Judge dismissed the petition on vague grounds and the same required to be set aside and that the learned Special Judge has not appreciated the case put forth by the petitioner in proper perspective. Thus, a prayer is made to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Per contra, Mr. H. Samarjit, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that after registration of the FIR and upon obtaining proper order from the concerned Magistrate, exhumation of the body of the deceased was conducted at the grave yard Rengkai Cemetery and required formalities were conducted at the place in the presence of the Executive Magistrate and witnesses. He would submit that the investigation of t
Ash Mohammad vs. Shiv Raj Singh alias Lalla Babu and another
Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail depends on various factors, including the nature of the offence, the presumption of innocence, and the need for a humane att....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail is the general rule and putting a person in jail is an exception. The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the ....
The delay in concluding the trial, the presumption of innocence, and the lack of prima facie evidence were central to the court's decision to grant bail to the petitioner.
(1) Bail – Object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative – Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that accused person will stand his trial when ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty and the need for a humane attitude in dealing with bail applications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, especially in cases where there is delay in concluding the trial and no conclusive evidence connect....
The main legal point established is that the presumption of innocence, the need for a speedy trial, and the balance between personal liberty and the investigational right of the police are crucial fa....
Bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and the accused should not be detained unless there are reasonable grounds to believe that he will tamper with evidence or obstruct justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of sexual intent for the offence of sexual harassment under the POCSO Act, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.