M. V. MURALIDARAN
Awang Kongpal Kongkham Leikai Development Committee – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 401 read with Section 397 and 398 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 28.9.2020 in Eviction Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.1 of 2020 passed by the fourth respondent under Section 133 Cr.P.C. read with Section 15 of the Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960.
2. Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. H. Samarjit, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State and learned counsel for the sixth respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of piece of homestead land under Patta No.23/296, Imphal East Tahasil, Porompat Sub- Division, covered by C.S. Dag No.31/597 measuring an extent of 0.90 acre Ingkhol Class situated at 23-Khongkham Leikai Revenue Village and the said land has been occupying by the petitioner without any disturbances from all quarters. Kongpal Makha Kongkham Leikai Development Committee formed by the localities of Kongpal Makha Kongkham Leikai was the owner of the land in question and the revenue records stood in the name of Kongpal Makha Kongkham Leikai. Later on, the name was changed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.