Back
A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
MV. Abdul Nasir – Appellant
Versus
Pitru Begum – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Babina, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. FA Khalid, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Unisha Rashnee, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. Liaquat Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. This Civil Revision petition has been filed seeking the prayers as follows:
(b) Quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 22-02-2021 passed by the Ld. Rev. Tribunal, Manipur in Rev. Revision Case No.4 of 2020.
(c) Consequent to the quashing and setting aside of the impugned judgment and order dated 22-02-2021 passed by the Ld. Rev. Tribunal, Manipur in Rev. Revision Case No.4 of 2020, the Mutation Orders dated 11-03-2005 passed by the Ld. AS & SO, Imphal East in Mutation order Case No.25/AS & SO/IE/1(Annexure A/3) and the second mutation order dated 26-10-2019 passed by the AS & SO-III in Rev. Misc. (C) No.288/AS & SO-III (Annexure A/10) be quashed and set aside. Further, the partition order dated 26-12-2013 passed by the Ld. SDO, Porompat, Imphal East in Partition Case No. 608 of 2013/SDO(P)IE (Annexure A/6) be also be quash
The Revenue Tribunal must ensure compliance with statutory requirements in mutation proceedings, retaining jurisdiction to review such orders despite disputes over title.
The court emphasized that the order of mutation neither confers nor extinguishes any right of the parties over the land and that the purpose of mutation is only to collect government revenue from a p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Divisional Commissioner acted beyond jurisdiction in entertaining the revision application and passing the impugned orders, as the power o....
Complicated inheritance disputes regarding land rights should be resolved through regular civil suits, not summary mutation proceedings, as determined under applicable land laws.
The court emphasized the importance of proper exercise of revisional jurisdiction and the need for valid mutations in land disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of revisional jurisdiction must be within a reasonable time, and that mutation does not confer title to the property.
Mutation proceedings - There is no finding recorded either by Appellate Court or by Revisional Court as to who was in actual possession of property in question and therefore liable to pay revenue to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
