SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Manipur) 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
MV. Abdul Nasir and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Mst. Pitru Begum and ors. - Respondents
CRP(C.R.P. ART.227) No.21 of 2021
Decided On : 22-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. N. Ibotombi, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Babina, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mr. FA Khalid, Adv. assisted by Ms. Unisha Rashnee, Mr. Liaquat, Adv.

The Revenue Tribunal must ensure compliance with statutory requirements in mutation proceedings, retaining jurisdiction to review such orders despite disputes over title.

Headnote:(A) Manipur Land Revenue & Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 46 and Section 159 - Civil Revision petition challenging mutation orders - The learned Tribunal failed to exercise its jurisdiction regarding non-compliance with statutory requirements in the mutation process, leading to an erroneous presumption of title dispute - The impugned order dated 22-02-2021 was set aside and remanded for merit examination. (Paras 18, 19)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash mutation orders regarding land inherited from their great grandmother, alleging improper procedure and fraud by the Principal Respondent No.1. (Paras 3-5)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal incorrectly presumed a title dispute and abdicated its jurisdiction to address procedural compliance in the mutation orders. (Paras 18-19)

Issues: The main issues were whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the mutation orders and if the correct procedures were followed under the relevant act. (Paras 18-19)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the mutation orders and must ensure compliance with statutory requirements, clarifying that the civil court's jurisdiction remains intact regarding title disputes. (Paras 18-19)

Result: The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

JUDGMENT :

A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.

1. Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Babina, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. FA Khalid, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Unisha Rashnee, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. Liaquat Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

2. This Civil Revision petition has been filed seeking the prayers as follows:

    (a) Admit the present Petition.

    (b) Quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 22-02-2021 passed by the Ld. Rev. Tribunal, Manipur in Rev. Revision Case No.4 of 2020.

    (c) Consequent to the quashing and setting aside of the impugned judgment and order dated 22-02-2021 passed by the Ld. Rev. Tribunal, Manipur in Rev. Revision Case No.4 of 2020, the Mutation Orders dated 11-03-2005 passed by the Ld. AS & SO, Imphal East in Mutation order Case No.25/AS & SO/IE/1(Annexure A/3) and the second mutation order dated 26-10-2019 passed by the AS & SO-III in Rev. Misc. (C) No.288/AS & SO-III (Annexure A/10) be quashed and set aside. Further, the partition order dated 26-12-2013 passed by the Ld. SDO, Porompat, Imphal East in Partition Case No. 608 of 2013/SDO(P)IE (Annexure A/6) be also be quashed and set aside;

    (d) Allow the Petitioner to raise more points at the time of hearing of the present Petition.

3. Facts and circumstances narrated in the case are that the petitioners’ paternal great grandmother namely Mst. Shamshu Nesha was allotted a piece of homestead land at Mana Ingkhol, Minuthong, Hapta Makha Leikai, Imphal East by the State Government vide allotment Order No. DC(C)/8/717/Rev./79(P) dated 27.06.1979 which has been referred hereto as the Original Land. The Petitioner’s above named great grandmother had 2(two) sons, the first one was called Md. Basir Ali and the second one was called Md. Manao. The elder son, Md. Basir Ali predeceased her mother but left behind a daughter and a son namely Md. Ranjan who is the father of the present Petitioners. The second son of Mst. Shamshu Nesha, i.e, Md. Manao died as a bachelor living no heir. Since the petitioners’ grandfather predeceased his own mother while his younger brother died as a bachelor, the only male heir of Mst. Shamshu Nesha was her only grandson, i.e, Md. Ranjan, the father of the present petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners’ great grandmother Mst. Shamshu Nesha gifted the Original Land to her only grandson, i.e, the Petitioners’ father namely (L) Md. Ranjan. The Original Land gifted to the Petitioner’s father is referred to as the Parent Land.

4. In the meantime, the above-mentioned petitioners’ great grandmother, i.e, Ms. Shamshu Nesha due to her advancing age as well as the deteriorating health condition, hired one woman i.e, the Principal Respondent No.1 to take care and look after her needs and to attend to her call and the Principal Respondent No.1 was made to stay with the Petitioners’ great grandmother at the “Parent Land”. Prior to the petitioners’ great grandmother gifting the parent land to the petitioners’ father, a portion of the Original Land was sold off to one Md. Jahiruddin Hazi by the petitioners’ great grandmother in consultation with the petitioners’ father so as to enable them to construct a housing structure from the proceed of the sale over the Parent Land so as to use both for commercial as well as residential purposes. Since most of the transfer at that time was made verbally or through some katcha agreement, the aforementioned buyer, namely Md. Jahiruddin was also recorded as a Co-pattadar of the Original Land until separated. Later on, making the petitioners’ father the sole owner of the Parent Land and the petitioners’ father Md. Ranjan’s name was entered in the land records of the original land on being gifted the same by the petitioners’ great grandmother and his name along with the aforementioned Md. Jahiruddin Hazi were recorded as co-pattadars of the Original Land until separated and thereafter become the absolute owner and title holder of

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top