SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Manipur) 26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
Shri Mangneikam Haokip - Petitioner
Versus
Officer-in-Charge, Chassad Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Kamjong – Respondent
I. Bail Appln. No. 9 of 2023 [Ref: FIR No. 02(01)2022 CSD PS, u/s 18(b) ND&PS Act] & II. Bail Appln. No. 10 of 2023 [Ref: FIR No. 02(02)2023 CSD PS, u/s 18/46 ND&PS Act]
Decided On : 07-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. RK. Umakanta, PP.

The right to default bail is indefeasible if the prosecution fails to file a chargesheet or extension application within the statutory period, and oral submissions during bail hearings suffice for claiming this right.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18(b) and 46 - Bail applications filed under Section 439 CrPC for FIRs relating to poppy cultivation - The petitioner claimed default bail due to non-filing of chargesheet within the statutory period - The court held that the right to default bail is indefeasible if the prosecution fails to file chargesheet or application for extension within the stipulated time. (Paras 11, 12, 22, 24)

(B) Default Bail - Indefeasible right - The court emphasized that oral submissions during bail hearings are sufficient for claiming default bail, and subsequent filings by the prosecution cannot extinguish this right. (Paras 19, 23)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Village Chief, was arrested for alleged involvement in poppy cultivation under two FIRs. He filed bail applications citing lack of evidence and default in chargesheet filing. The police contended he was responsible as per customary law.

Findings of Court:
The court granted bail on the basis of default due to the prosecution's failure to file timely chargesheets or extension applications.

Issues: Whether oral submissions can be treated as applications for default bail and if subsequent filings by the prosecution extinguish this right.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the right to default bail is enforceable until a chargesheet is filed and that oral submissions suffice for such applications.

Result: Bail applications allowed.

ORDER :

A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.

1. Heard Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. RK. Umakanta, learned PP for the State respondent.

2. The petitioner has filed Bail Application being BA No. 9 of 2023 under Section 439 CrPC in connection with FIR No. 02(01)2022 Chassad PS u/s 18(b) ND&PS Act and BA No.10 of 2023 in connection with FIR No. 02(02)2013 Chassad PS u/s 18/46 ND&PS Act. Earlier, one single Bail Application being BA No. 9 of 2023 was filed for both FIRs. Later on, BA No.10 of 2023 was also filed for FIR No. 02(02)2023 and BA No. 9 of 2023 was treated in connection with FIR No. 02(01)2022.

3. Brief fact of the case in FIR No. 02(01)2022 is that on 19.01.2022, a combined team of Kamjong District Police, NAB, 6 MR and Forest Department Kamjong carried out destruction of illicit poppy cultivation at Lanchah Village hill range of Kamjong under the jurisdiction of Chassad Police Station. About 26 acres of poppy cultivated areas were destroyed and accordingly FIR No. 02(01)2022 CSD PS u/s 18(b) ND&PS Act was registered. As the petitioner was Village Chief for the area under poppy cultivation, a notice was issued to him for appearance. The petitioner approached the court of learned Special Judge (NDPS), Ukhrul, Manipur under Section 438 CrPC by way of an application being Cril. Misc. (AB) Case No. 15 of 2022 for pre arrest bail and vide order dated 22.11.2022, he was granted interim protection. However, by an order dated 06.02.2023, the interim bail was vacated and the bail application was rejected. Then, the petitioner was arrested on 06.02.2023 and was remanded to police custody and on 10.02.2023 to judicial custody.

4. For FIR No. 02(02)2023, it is stated that on 22.01.2023, Kamjong District Police led by Shri Semmi Ramror MPS, Addl. SP (LO), Kamjong conducted a survey and found poppy plants cultivation on land measuring an area of about 15 acres located at a place of 1 km North-East of Maokot village settlement area in Lanchah Village under Sahamphung Sub-division, P.O. & P.S. Chasad, Kamjong District. A survey report was submitted to District Magistrate, Kamjong for issuing an order of attachment and destruction of poppy cultivated land. Thereafter, the order for attachment and destruction of poppy cultivated land was ordered under Section 48 ND & PS Act 1985 by the District Magistrate, Kamjong. For investigation, a FIR No. 02(02)2023 CSD PS u/s 18/46 ND&PS Act was registered on suo-moto.

5. On 08.02.2023, a combined team of Kamjong District Police, 1st Bn MR, 6th Bn MR, 7th Bn MR, MPTC Pangei, NAB and Forest Department, Kamjong Division conducted the poppy plant destruction at Maokot Village Jurisdiction and 6.900 kgs of poppy pods with plants were seized. The seizure items were produced before the JMFC, Ukhrul on 11.02.2023 along with a prayer for sampling and forwarding of the exhibit to the Director, DFS, Manipur for examination. Thereafter, the samples were sent to the Director, DFS, Pangei on 16.02.2023.

6. On 06.02.2023, the accused/petitioner was arrested in connection with another FIR being FIR No. 02(01)2022 CSD PS, U/S 18(b) ND & PS Act relating to poppy cultivation. As such, the accused was remanded into judicial custody on 10.02.2023.

7. According to the police report, it is stated that the poppy cultivated area is within Lanchah Village and as per the customary law, the petitioner who is the Chief of Lanchah Village is the sole owner of the poppy cultivated land. During the course of investigation, it has come to the light that the accused person was involved in the above referred FIR case. Hence, the accused being the Chief of Lanchah Village is required to be interrogated at JIC, Imphal and for taking photograph and finger print for further investigation of the case.

8. The I.O of the present case prayed for police custody remand for formal arrest of the accused from jail for the purpose of further investigation in connection with FIR No. 02(02) 2023 CSD PS, U/S 18/46 ND & PS Act. Vide orde

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top