SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Manipur) 35

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Mutum Robindro Singh – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent


Table of Content
1. writ petition challenging notice of eviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contentions regarding ancestral property and eviction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court grants liberty to appeal against the order. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. disposal of the writ petition. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER :

A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA, J.

[1] Heard Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel assisted by Ms. L. Ashapriya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Julius Riamei, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Stephen P, learned counsel for the respondent.

[2] The petitioner approached this Court by way of the present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice dated 24.03.2025 issued by the Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, Sub Zonal Office, Imphal.

[3] By the impugned notice, the petitioner has been directed to vacate from homestead land with RCC G+1 building of .0081 Hectare at Revenue Village No. 28 - Thoubal Achouba, Thoubal District, C.S Dag No. 2569/2652, Patta No. 413 (O)/1611/1907 (N).

[4] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the homestead land under Dag no. 2569/2652 having an area of .0081 hectare at Revenue Village No. 28 - Thoubal Acho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top