SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JEET RAM KAIT, ARCHANA WADHWA
Commissioner of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Tyazhpromexport – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.K. Kar,Partha Banerjee, S.K. Bagaria

ORDER

Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member. - Being aggrieved with that portion of the impugned Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), vide which he has set aside the penalty imposed upon the respondents, the Revenue has filed the present appeal.

2. As per facts on record, the respondent-company is an Association for Economic Affairs of the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Trade of the Russian Federation. They have a registered office and have entered into a contract with Rourkela Steel Plant located at Rourkela for providing technical services to RSP, for which purposes, they were to delegate specialists. In terms of the said contracts, all the taxes and duties were to be borne by Rourkela Steel Plant.

3. A dispute arose between the Department and the respondents for levy of service tax for the taxable service being provided by the respondents. They clarified the position and submitted that any tax, if leviable, has to be borne by RSP and also made a request to M/s. Rourkela Steel Plant to make arrangements for payment of Service Tax. After taking the legal opinion etc., the Service Tax was deposited by RSP along with the interest leviable thereon. The matter was taken up for adjudication

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top