SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.VEERAIYAN, P.K.DAS
Track pack (I) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Tomar, Surender Prasad,C.S. Rajput

ORDER

Per P.K. Das : The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of 'Self-Adhesive Hologram Sticker/Sheet and Holographic Film'. Show Cause Notice dated 9.9.03 was issued proposing to classify the said products under sub-heading No.3919.00 denying the claim of the assessee under sub-heading No.4401.90 and demanded duty for the period 16.9.98 to 2.5.02. It has also been alleged that shim development charges should be included in the assessable value. Original authority confirmed the classification under sub-heading No.3919.00 and confirmed demand of duty and imposed penalty of equal amount and penalty of Rs.3.50 lakhs each on the Managing Director and the General Manager. Commissioner (Appeals) only reduced penalties. Hence the assessee company, General Manager and Managing Director have filed these appeals against the demand of duty and penalties. Revenue also filed appeals against the reduction of penalties by the Commissioner (Appeals).

2. Heard both sides and perused record.

3. Learned Advocate for the assessee submits that the assessee had received metalized polyester film. They undertook the process mainly embossing (Printing) of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top