SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, T.ANJANEYULU, K.K.AGARWAL
Commissioner of Customs, Bhavnagar – Appellant
Versus
Lucky Steel Industries – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Saxena, R.B. Pardeshi,V. Sridharan

ORDER

Per K.K. Agarwal : Heard both sides.

2. The basic issue referred for decision by the Larger Bench [referral order reported in 2006 (76) RLT 93 (CESTAT-Mum.)] is that in case of import of ships for the purpose of scrapping whether any price variation on the basis of addendum issued to Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) can be allowed after the vessel has entered the territorial waters of India specially when there is no clause for price variation in the MOA and the only recourse provided in the case of discrepancy is, arbitration which was not taken recourse to, and the vessel is sold on the basis of LDT of the vessel by agreeing to a particular amount per Ton of LDT and there is no change in the LDT at the time of importation.

3. The learned D.R. Shri Pardeshi on behalf of the Revenue submitted that ships for scrapping are generally sold on the basis of the LDT of the vessel by agreeing to a particular amount per Ton of LDT and that this is an established practice of selling the vessel for breaking in international trade. LDT is a well defined term in maritime law and is commonly understood by all those who deal in the sale and purchase of old ships for the purpose of scrapping. Even

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top