Amitex Silk Mills (P. ) Ltd. VS Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

S.S.KANG, K.D.MANKAR, C.N.B.NAIR
Amitex Silk Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Anand,O.P. Arora

ORDER

Per K.D. Mankar : In all these are four appeals from the appellants, who are a 100% E.O.U. The dispute relates to duty liability in respect of Rejects and Waste of grey fabrics and twisted yarn cleared by the appellants from their E.O.U. to the domestic tariff area (D.T.A.). In the show cause notices following two common grounds are raised:-

(a) There was no valid permission for D.T.A. sale and

(b) After 01.04.1999, the Exim Policy prescribed D.T.A. entitlement based on F.O.B. value of export i.e. physical export only and not deemed exports.

1.1 The Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demands raised in each of the four show cause notices and imposed equal amounts of penalties in each case as indicated hereunder:

Sr. No.	Appeal No.	Order-in Original No. & Date	Show Cause Notice No. & Date	Amount of Duty & Penalty (Rs.)	Period	Finished goods
01	E/3079/02	32/Dem/2002 dtd. 9.9.2002	V (Ch. 54) 3-41/Dem/01 dtd. 27.6.2001	D-7,71,222/P-7,71,000/-	Jan. to Feb 2001	Grey Fabrics (Rejects & Waste)
02	E/3080/02	30/Dem/2002 dtd. 26.8.2002	V (Ch. 54) 3-42/Dem/01 dtd. 28.6.2001	D-2,69,424/P-2,69,000/-	Feb. to April 2001	Twisted Yarn (Rejects & Waste)
03	E/3081/02	33/Dem/2002 dtd. 9.9.2002	V (Ch. 54)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

S.S.KANG, K.D.MANKAR, C.N.B.NAIRAmitex Silk Mills (P. ) Ltd. – AppellantVersusCommissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I – Respondent

S.S.KANG, K.D.MANKAR, C.N.B.NAIR
Amitex Silk Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I – Respondent