SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.DESAI, LAJJA RAM
Godrej and Boyce Mfg. and Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Hidayatullah,Prabhat Kumar

ORDER

P.K. Desai, Member (J)

1. With identical issues involved in all these appeals they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order

2.1. Appeal No. E/3510/91A as also Appeal Nos. E/575/93A to E/583/93A with E/COD-75/93 to 83/93A are directed against the order-in-Appeal No. SDK/364/B-II/91 dated 17-9-1991 issued under F. No. V-2 (Ch.38)/751/90/3866 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, confirming the Order-in-original No. V. Ch. 84(30)39/89 dated 26-7-1990 of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bombay II. As these orders are the outcome of ten Show-cause Notices issued, the appellants having initially filed a single appeal (No. E/3510/91A) have chosen to file nine additional appeals (Nos. E/575/93 to 583/93) and as those subsequently filed appeals are filed after the expiry of the period of limitation specified for filing the appeal, the appellants have filed applications (E/COD/75/93 to E/COD/83/93) praying for condonation of delay.

2.2 When only one order-in-original is passed covering more than one Show-cause Notice, it is not necessary to file separate appeals for each Show-cause Notice covered under the same order and a single appeal co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top