SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Mazda Packaging Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K. Singh,D.B. Shroff

ORDER

S.L. Peeran, Member (J)

1. The revenue is aggrieved with the order-in-appeal passed by Ld. Collector (Appeals), Bombay allowing the benefit of S. No. 32 of the Notification No. 125/86-Cus., dated 17-2-1986 to the goods declared in the bill of entry dated 19-10-1987 as "Multi Layer (5 layers) co-extrusion machine and spare parts thereof on the ground that what is imported is a multi-layer film blowing plant for efficient co-extruded film manufacture with enormous versatility and the whole plant cannot be brought under the purview of "multi-layer extruding machine".

2. The ld. Collector (Appeals) has held in his order as follows :

"From the catalogue produced it is seen that the sub-assemblies or parts imported are all essential parts of the 3-layer blown film line and except for die-head all parts have been imported. The die-head is the only part which is interchangeable and all other parts are specially designed for the system for production of multi-layer co-extruded film and the end-product cannot be produced without any one of these parts and these parts are not of any material use in isolation. As per Note 5 to Section XVI 'machine' means any machine, apparatus or appliance o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top