P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Mazda Packaging Ltd. – Respondent
S.L. Peeran, Member (J)
1. The revenue is aggrieved with the order-in-appeal passed by Ld. Collector (Appeals), Bombay allowing the benefit of S. No. 32 of the Notification No. 125/86-Cus., dated 17-2-1986 to the goods declared in the bill of entry dated 19-10-1987 as "Multi Layer (5 layers) co-extrusion machine and spare parts thereof on the ground that what is imported is a multi-layer film blowing plant for efficient co-extruded film manufacture with enormous versatility and the whole plant cannot be brought under the purview of "multi-layer extruding machine".
2. The ld. Collector (Appeals) has held in his order as follows :
"From the catalogue produced it is seen that the sub-assemblies or parts imported are all essential parts of the 3-layer blown film line and except for die-head all parts have been imported. The die-head is the only part which is interchangeable and all other parts are specially designed for the system for production of multi-layer co-extruded film and the end-product cannot be produced without any one of these parts and these parts are not of any material use in isolation. As per Note 5 to Section XVI 'machine' means any machine, apparatus or appliance o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.