R.JAYARAMAN, P.K.DESAI
Jayshree Industries – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
R. Jayaraman, Member (T)
1. All the above 15 Appeals are against the Common Order in Appeal passed by the Collector (Appeals) under his Order No. 363 to 377/91, dated 25-4-1991.
2. Since the issue involved in all these appeals is one and the same, they were heard together and hence proposed to be disposed of by this common order.
3. Though, in some cases, some minor issues (which are not common) exist, the Ld. Advocate pleaded that they have not appealed against them and they are pressing only, one issue namely the eligibility of Modvat Credit in respect of duty paid on dry battery cells fitted to the Quartz, Clocks and time pieces.
4. All the four appellants referred to above are engaged in the manufacture of Quartz, Wall Clocks classifiable under 9105.00 of Central Excise Tariff. They bring in duty paid dry battery cells, which are reportedly placed in the battery compartment in such a manner to prevent leakage of the dry cells and thereafter sealed and packed for delivery at the factory gate to the buyers. They filed a declaration under the Modvat Scheme, showing these battery cells as an input against the final product Quartz, Wall Clocks. This, however, came to be objected to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.