D.C.MANDAL, S.V.MARUTHI
Sree Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
S.V. Maruthi, Member (J)
1. The appellants manufacture Asbestos Cement Products. They paid duty on these products without excluding the expenses incurred on freight. On realising the mistake, they preferred 12 refund claims totalling to Rs. 1,72,27,253.00. The Assistant Collector rejected the refund application. The Collector allowed the appeal filed by the appellants and remanded the same to the Assistant Collector for quantification of the actual freight incurred by the appellants and also for verification of the refund claims. Accordingly, the Assistant Collector, verified the actual freight and the refund claims and sanctioned a refund of Rs. 49,57,243.57 out of the total amount of Rs. 1,72,27,253.00 by his order dated 11-5-1987.
2. Against the refund sanctioned by the Assistant Collector, the Collector, in exercise of the powers, conferred under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944, directed the Assistant Collector to file an appeal to the Collector alleging, inter alia, that
"against serial No. 6 in annexure 'D' 'amount due' is shown as Rs. 57,38,009.42. This is not correct. Correct figure comes to Rs. 57,28,009.42. This has resulted in excess refund of Rs
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.