M.GOURI SHANKAR MURTHY, D.C.MANDAL, P.C.JAIN
Hind Lamp Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur – Respondent
P.C. Jain, Member (T)
1. Brief facts of the case in so far material are as follows :-
The appellant had been submitting price lists of various goods manufactured by it under Rule 173-C of the Central Excise Rules (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) from time to time during the period 15.3.73 to 30.9.75. These price lists had not included, as per declaration on the reverse of these price lists, the cost of secondary special packing and delivery charges recovered by the appellant company from its customers. On submission of the price lists the appellant company had been clearing the goods on payment of duty on the basis of its declared assessable value i.e. without including the cost of special secondary packing and delivery charges declared by it on the reverse of the price lists. The appellant company had also been submitting R.T. 12s during this period.
Neither the price lists were approved by the Department nor were any assessments made on R.T. 12 by the proper officer till a show cause notice was issued on 3rd July, 1976 asking the appellant company as to why the charges recovered by it from its customers towards packing and delivery be not included in the value of the foo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.