Back
G.SANKARAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Kiran Spinning Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II – Respondent
G. Sankaran, Vice President (T)
1. These appeals arise out of, and are directed against, the common order-in-appeal dated 20-10-1981 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay disposing of four appeals filed before him. Initially, M/s. Kiran Spinning Mills (the appellants) had filed a single revision application before the Central Government against the said order and this was received in this Tribunal on transfer under Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, (the "Act" for short), for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before the Tribunal. Later on, in accordance with the practice and procedure of this Tribunal, the appellants filed three supplementary appeals since there were four causes of action.
2. The appeals involve common issues of classification and are, therefore, disposed of by this common order. The distinctive features of the individual appeals will be dealt with at the appropriate stage(s).
3. The facts of the cases are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of different varieties of yarn by spinning of different fibres as well as by doubling/twisting of duty-paid spun yarn with rayon filament yarn. In the present mat
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
