SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

F.S.GILL, G.SANKARAN, H.R.SYIEM
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.V. Raghavan Iyer, Mahesh Kumar,F.S. Nariman, V.J. Taraporewala

ORDER

G. Sankaran, Member (J)

1. The present proceedings arise out of a Show Cause Notice dated 6th October, 1980 issued by the Central Government to M/s. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd., Madras (hereinafter referred to as MRF) under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises 5c Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The notice was in relation to Order-in-Appeal No. 1215/80 dated 21-4-1980 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Madras, whereby the Appellate Collector disposed of the appeal before him against the order of adjudication dated 24-1-1978 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras.

2. The proceedings initiated with the issue of the aforesaid Show Cause Notice came to be transferred to this Tribunal in terms of Section 35P(2) of the Central Excises Salt Act for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it.

3. The Supreme Court, in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 1409-10/77, 10108/80 C.A. Nos. 3195/79 and 6811/83 (The Assistant Collector of Central Excise etc. etc. v. Madras Rubber Factory, etc. etc.), passed an order dated 8-11-1983 directing the Tribunal to dispose of the question as to whether the sales effected by MRF at their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top