SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, J.H.JOGLEKAR
Suman Silk Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Baroda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mayur Shroff,M.H. Shaikh

ORDER

Per J.H. Joglekar :

The appellant processed grey fabrics received from traders on job work basis. On 05/01/1989 a vehicle containing goods cleared from the premises was intercepted and was brought back to the factory. Discrepancies were noted in the original and other copies of the gate passes covering the consignment. Examination of gate passes under which goods had earlier been removed showed that while the first copy was fully completed the other copies were left blank. The fabrics totally valued at Rs. 4,04,124/- were seized along with the tempo. The Excise Clerk admitted that the modus of leaving the other copy blank was to enable evasion of duty and that it was done at the instance of Champalal Chopra, Director.

2. Investigations showed number of discrepancies in the lot registers which the Excise Clerk admitted were done deliberately under the instructions of Champalal Chopra. Chopra in his statement dated 09/01/1989 accepted the large-scale variations, erasions and scoring out in a number of registers and attempt to preparing fake invoices and gate passes and also offered to pay the duty leviable thereon. Thereafter officers contacted the octroi naka which kept detailed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top