Back
V.K.AGRAWAL, P.G.CHACKO
Trident Modular Technologies (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay-II – Respondent
Per P.G. Chacko :
These nine appeals are directed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II dated 30.06.92. The appeals were filed by the following parties:
| S.No. | Name of the Party | Appeal No. | |||
| 1. | M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3600/92-B | |||
| 2. | Shri Sudhir Shriram Seth, Director, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3601/92-B | |||
| 3. | Shri Vasant Ramchandra Desai, Prodn. Supervisor, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3602/92-B | |||
| 4. | ShriElijahA.Elias, Director, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3603/92-B | |||
| 5. | Shri Mahendra Babubhai Shah, General Manager, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3604/92-B | |||
| 6. | Mrs. Himadri Shachin Nanavati, Proprietress, M/s. Starline Products. | E/3605/92-B | |||
| 7. | Mrs. Chitra Arunkumar Seth, Proprietress, M/s. Santulan Enterprises. | E/3606/92-B | |||
| 8. | Shri A.N. Narayanan, Proprietor, M/s. Fridge Air Corporation (India). | E/3607/92-B | |||
| 9. | Shri KarunakarS. Shetty, Excise Clerk, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. | E/3608/92-B |
As per the impugned order, M/s. Trident Modular Technologies P. Ltd. were asked to pay Central Excise duty of Rs. 31,94,857.29 and a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs was imposed on them. A redemption f
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
