SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, V.K.ASHTANA
Acqua Pump Industries – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Suresh,S. Kannan

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran :

This appeal arises from the order in original No. 44/91 dated 13.5.91 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise confirming duty demand of Rs. 1,42,333.93 under Rule 9 (2) of the CE Rules read with Section 11A besides imposing penalty of Rs. 2,000/- on the appellants in terms of Rule 9 (2), 173Q and 226 of the CE Rules, 1944.

2. Appellants were alleged to have manufactured and cleared Die Cast Rotors falling under heading 8503.00 without payment of duty, without following any procedure and suppressed the fact of the said manufacture and clearance from the department. The appellants contended that this Die Cast Rotors were used in the manufacture of Monoblock Pumps in terms of Notification No. 142/88 dated 18.4.88.

3. The learned Additional Collector had held that benefit of the Notification was not available as the appellants had not followed the chapter X procedure as contained in the CE Rules. He has also not disputed the fact that the item in question was being used in the manufacture of Mono Block Pump which was exempted, but as the appellants have not followed procedure outlined under Chapter X, they are not entitled to the benefit. He has als

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top