SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
P.C. Jain, S.L. PEERAN, JJ.
Agrico Engg. Works -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Meerut -Respondent
Misc. Order No. E/273/93-B1, Final order no. E/271/94-B1 Appeal No. E/3179/91-B1, 272 of 1993, 271 of 1994, 3179 of 1991
Decided On : 13-05-1994

Advocates Appeared:
G.L. Rawal,S.K. Sharma

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran

The appellants are aggrieved with the order-in-original passed by Collector of Central Excise, Meerut.

2. By this order the ld. Collector has confirmed a duty demand of (i) Rs. 15,000/- basic and Rs. 750.00 (Special) on 200 pcs. of Hydraulic Power Lift Bodies cleared by assessee to M/s. Escorts Ltd. and seized by Central Excise Officers of Faridabad as duty to the above extent had been short paid on such goods under Rule 9 (2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

ii) Imposed Rs. 20,000/- fine on the said seized goods and amount appropriated from Rs. 11 lakhs.

iii) Ordered for confiscation of 781 pes. of Hydraulic Power Lift Bodies bearing brand name of 'Escort' valued at Rs. 5,85,780,00 and 19 plates bearing brand name of 'B.M.' valued at Rs. 1,14,800.00, seized on 6.3.90 by Central Excise Officers and held the assessee liable to pay Rs. 80,000/- as fine and the same was appropriated from bond B-11.

iv) Demanded and confirmed a excise duty amount of Rs. 11,42,843.12 Basic and Rs. 44,953.20 (special) evaded/short paid by the party on the branded tractor parts of such tractor engine capacity of which exceeded 1800cc cleared by them to M/s. Escorts Ltd., Baridabad during Oct'87 to Feb'90 under Rule 9 (2) read with Section 11A of Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944.

v) Demanded and confirmed excise duty amount of Rs. 3,02,232.10 basic and Rs. 11,861.65 (special) evaded/short paid by the party on the parts of paper printing machine bearing brand name of 'B.M' manufactured and cleared by the party to M/s. Bandhu Machinery (P) Ltd., Gurgaon during Oct'87 to Feb'90 under Rule 9 (2) read with the provision of Section 11A of Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944.

vi) Imposed penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs on the party under Rule 9 (2) and Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

3. The facts of the case are that the officers of the Preventive Officers Central Excise, Faridabad, while petroling on Mathura Road, Faridabad intercepted a Truck bearing Reg. No. DLL-6452 coming from Bedarpur Delhi side. On demand, the driver produced GP.I No. 102 dt. 5.3.90 issued by the assessee and other documents. On a physical check, the officers found in the truck 'Hydraulic Power Lift Body' (Tractor parts) used in the manufacture of Tractors (exceeding 1800 cc) affixed with a brand name of 'ESCORT' embossed on the said lift bodies on one side and 041-AEW on the other side. On examining the G.P.I, it revealed that the party was availing concessional rate of date as applicable to SSI units at the rate of 10% advance in terms of notification No. 175/86-CE dt. 1.3.86 as amended. On further scrutiny, it revealed that the party was not entitled to the benefit of exemption notification No. 175/86-CE as they were affixing the brand name of 'ESCORT' a brand name of another person, who was not eligible for such exemption in view of amendment brought about the notification No. 233/87 dt. 22.9.87. Hence, these goods were confiscated by the officers for contravention of rule 9 (2) and Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

4. In a follow-up action, the officers visited factory premises on 6.3.90 and found that the party was engaged in the manufacturer of Hydraulic Power Lift Body, wheel reduction housing (Tractor parts) classifiable under sub-heading 8708.00 of Central Excise Tariff, 1985 attracting CEB @ 20% of advance and also parts of papers printing machinery classifiable under sub-heading 9443.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting duty @ 15% advance in their factory located at Hapur road, Ghaziabad. The party had registered with Directorate of Industries, U.P. and found availing of the benefit of SSI as available under exempting Notification No. 175/86-CE dt. 1.3.86.

5. The physical verification of stocks was carried on in the presence of Shri K.K. Sachdeva, Foreman. On physical verification, it was found that there were 262 pcs. of Hydraulic Power Lift Body duly finished and having brand name of 'ESCORT' engraved on them. Besides, this 519 pcs. of Hydraul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top