SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.SREEDHARAN, C.N.B.NAIR, P.G.CHACKO
Freightwings and Travels Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Chandrasekharan, Naveen Mullick, Rupesh Kumar Sharma,M.M. Dubey

ORDER

Per P.G. Chacko :

The appellant-Company was holding a regular licence granted under Regulation 10 of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations 1984 (in short, CHA Regulations) read with Section 146 of the Customs Act, 1962 to transact business as a Custom House Agent (in short, CHA) at Bombay Custom House. The licensing authority viz. Commissioner of Customs (General),Mumbai suspended the licence with immediate effect as per order dated 14.9.2000 under Regulation 21 (2) of the CHA Regulations. The authority was acting upon a report received from the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai, which stated that the CHA had acted in collusion with an exporting company in defrauding the Revenue by claiming undue drawback of customs duty by misdeclaring goods in shipping bills. The CHA preferred appeal to this Tribunal challenging the said order of the Commissioner (G) on the main ground that the order was made in breach of the principles of natural justice inasmuch as neither any show-cause notice was served on them nor any personal hearing was given to them before the order was issued. It was also contended by the appellants that the impugned order was not in compliance wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top