SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.H.JOGLEKAR, J.N.SRINIVASA MURTHY
Jalyan Udyog – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.H. Patil, A.D. Maru, R.K. Ghadye,A. Ashokan

ORDER

Per J.H. Joglekar :

The appellants imported one Drill Ship for scrapping and filed Bill of Entry on 20.8.1992 for clearance thereof. At the material time the quantum of duty was to be determined by reference to the "Light Displacement Tonnage (L.D.T.)" of such vessels. The definition of LDT read as under :

"Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT) means LDT in MTs as per builder's registered L.D.T. referred to in the Stability Book or the Builder's Certificate".

2. They produced a certificate dated 29.6.1992 from American Bureau of Shipping. The Certificate read as follows :

"This is to confirm that on the basis of documents already in our records, the light ship weight of the vessel after being converted in 1975 is 9,609.25 long tons without any ballast."

3. The Memorandum of agreement witnessing the purchase by the appellants described the price as US $176 per long tons of LDT, excluding permanent ballast, in accordance with the certificate from the ABS referred to above. A report of M/s. Ericson & Richards at Bombay, citing the ABS certificate reconfirmed the LDT. It also cited the vessel's capacity plan, showing the LDT of the ship as 14,806.75/- long tons including permanent ballast

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top