SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.C.C.UNNI, V.K.AGRAWAL
Karl Storz Endoscopy India (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Swaminathan,S. Ramanathan

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

The issue involved in this Appeal filed by M/s. Karl Storz Endoscopy India (P) Ltd. is whether Cold Light Fountain imported by them is exempted wholly from payment of Customs Duty as per Serial 249 of the Table annexed to Notification No. 23/98-Cus. dt. 2.6.1998.

2. The Assistant Commissioner, Customs denied the benefit of Sl.No. 249 of Notification No. 23/98-Cus to cold light fountain holding that the product manual/literature no where specified that the impugned goods was meant for Tubal occulsion; that as per manual, the cold light fountain was usable in all endoscopic intervention and whereas the benefit under Serial No. 249 is only for equipments which are meant for tubal occulsion. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) also denied the benefit of Serial No. 249 of Notification No. 23/98 as the light source had been proved as accessory of endoscopes and not laproscopes or specifically for tublar occulsion; that Notification has given a general entry as endoscope and its accessories and certain specific entries for different specialised endoscopes and if it was the intention to allow benefit to all endoscopes and their accessories, there was no need for dif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top