SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
P.C. Jain, A.C.C. Unni, JJ.
Silver Oak Labs -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay -Respondent
Final Order Nos. A/102-3/99-NB Appeal Nos. C/630 & 631/98-NB), A/102 of 1999, 103 of 1999, C/630 of 1998, 631 of 1998
Decided On : 05-02-1999

Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarthy,Satnam Singh

ORDER

Per P.C. Jain :

The appellants herein imported goods described as "synthetic perfumery compound" and claimed ITC (HS) classification under 33029001.10. The Revenue drew a sample of a consignment so imported by the appellants and sent it for test. They asked the following queries from the Chemical Examiner:-

(1) Composition

(2) nature

(3) whether it is synthetic perfumery compound and

(4) whether it is alcoholic solutions for perfumery.

1. In his report the Chemical Examiner stated as follows:-

"The sample is a mixture of odoriferous substances in the form of light brown colour liquid and it is free from alcohol. It is a synthetic perfumery preparation."

In the meantime another consignment had been imported by the appellants. Based on the aforesaid test report Revenue felt that it should be classified under ITC (HS) Classification 33029001.20. Classification as claimed by the appellants required a special import licence which was produced by the appellants. It is not disputed by the appellants that classification as proposed by the Revenue required a licence which was not produced by the appellants. Hence the adjudication order was passed by the adjudicating authority, on waiver of a show cause notice by the appellants herein, holding that the classification as proposed by the Revenue is correct and rejected the classification claimed by the appellants. The appellants did not succeed before the lower appellate authority. This was the fate in respect of both the consignments. Hence these two appeals before us.

2. In order to understand the controversy, we reproduce below the Heading 33.02 and its sub-classifications as given in ITC (HS) Classification :-

330210 00.10

Synthetic flavouring

essences

Restricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued in

this behalf

Import permitted

against Special

Import Licence

(SIL)

330210 00.20OtherRestricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public Not-

ice issued in this

behalf

330290 00Other
330290 01

Mixtures of aroma-

tic chemicals &

essential oils as

perfume base

330290 01.10

Synthetic perfumery

compounds

Restricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public Not-

ice issued in this

behalf

Import permitted

against Special

Import Licence

(SIL)

330290 01.20OtherRestricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued in

this behalf

330290 02

Synthetic essential

oils

Restricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued in

this behalf

Import permitted

against Special

Import Licence

(SIL)

330290 02.10

Synthetic perfumery

compounds

Restricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued

in this behalf

Import permitted

against Special

Import Licence

(SIL)

330290 03

Aleuritic acid

Restricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued in

this behalf

330290 09

Others (alcoholic

solutions for

perfumery)

330290 09.90OtherRestricted

Import permitted

against a licence

or in accordance

with a Public

Notice issued in

this behalf

2. In short, the dispute is whether synthetic perfumery compounds as imported by the appellants are different from synthetic perfumery preparations, as held by the Chemical Examiner in the context of the classification under ITC (HS).

3. Learned consultant, Shri R. Parthasarthy has drawn attention to the main classification 33.02. He also draws specific attention to the expression "other preparations" in the said entry 33.02. Use of the word "other" in the expression "other preparations" he points out, indicates that the earlier group of commodities mixture of odoriferous substances are also preparations otherwise the word "other" would not been used in the second group of commodities under the said classification 33.02. He has also taken us through the dictionary meanings of New Webster's Dictionary. The word `preparation' has been defined, inter alia, as "something prepared, manufactured or compounded; as, a medicinal preparation......" He, therefore, s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top