SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, V.K.AGRAWAL
Punjab Power Packs Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Nambirajan,R.S. Sangia

ORDER

Per Jyoti Balasundaram :

In this case, a duty demand of Rs. 2,43,702.21 P. has been confirmed on a quantity of 20,000 litres of liquid electrolytes produced in the appellants factory by mixing of duty paid Potassium Hydroxide (Solid KOH) with DI water to obtain solution of required specific gravity (used for formulation processes and testing of cells used in stationery batteries) and a quantity of 61,379.90 litres of solid KOH and LIOH (Lithium Hydroxide) despatched alongwith the stationery batteries manufactured by the appellants to their customers, on the ground that liquid electrolyte is an excisable commodity attracting 15% ad-valorem of Special Excise duty under sub heading 38.23 of the Schedule to the CETA 1985, and not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 217/86-CE dated 2.3.86 since the stationery batteries for which the liquid electrolyte was used were exempt from duty under Notification No. 68/86-CE dated 10.2.86. The Adjudicating authority has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 60,000/- upon the appellants.

2. We have heard Shri R. Nambirajan learned Advocate who contends that the mixing of potassium hydroxide with water in the appellants factory and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top