SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.C.C.UNNI, C.N.B.NAIR
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Indore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Lakshmi Kumaran, G. Shiv Dass,Prabhat Kumar

ORDER

Per A.C.C. Unni :

In these two appeals, common issue has been raised for consideration. They were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. We have heard Shri V. Lakshmi Kumaran, learned Advocate for the appellants and Shri Prabhat Kumar, learned Senior Departmental Representative appearing for the respondent Collector.

3. Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of heavy and sophisticated Electrical & Electronics equipments and machinery which are designed as per the specific requirements of the customers. The terms and conditions of sale also contain a condition relating to warranty which provides for replacement of the items if they developed defects within a period of 12 months from the date of commissioning or 18 months from the date of despatch, whichever is earlier. An amount of 2.5% of the factory cost is set apart by the appellants as 'complaint reserve' in the contractual price entered into by them. The Central Excise duty is paid by the appellants on the total contract sale value. Where in terms of the warranty clause the appellants supply replacements to their customers, appellants do not discharge any further duty since, according

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top