P.C.JAIN, ARCHANA WADHWA
Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-II – Appellant
Versus
Berger Paints India Ltd. – Respondent
Per Shri P.C. Jain, Member (T) :
Short question involved in this matter is whether conversion of duty paid "araldite" in cake-form under erstwhile Central Excise Tariff Item 15A (1) and purchased from outside into a solution by dissolving it in petroleum-based solvents make the latter again liable to duty under the same tariff entry 15A (1).
2. Original authority, namely Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-II has held that the solution of "Araldite", in the above circumstances is not liable to duty again. It held that the process does not amount to manufacture of another commodity. "Araldite" resin in cake-form is converted to another form i.e. solution without bringing into existence another commodity known to the trade having a different name, character and use. The said authority, in coming to the aforesaid conclusion, has relied on several judgements of Courts and the Tribunal which are as follows:-
(1) M/s. Coromandal Prodorite (P) Ltd. Vs. Government of India [1985 (20) ELT 257 (MAD)]
(2) State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Pyarelal Malhotra [1983 ELT 1582 (S.C.)]
(3) M/s. Swadeshi Mills Co. Vs. Union of India 1982 ELT 237 (Bom)]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.