SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.P.AGARWAL, G.R.SHARMA
Lakshmi Cement – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Lahoty,Sanjeev Sachdeva

ORDER

Per G.R-Sharma: Thisappealisdirectedagainsttheorder-in-originalNo.3/ TVS/92 dated 3.11.92: The Collector, Central Excise, in his order held:

"Further definition of plan which includes design and drawings as classified by the Hon'ble CEGAT order must have been hand drawn to accept its inclusion under 4606. So this Hon'ble CEGAT order is not applicable to the subject issue.

Now the importers reference to chapter note 4 last sentence deserves our attention, It states that 'however printed picture or illustrations not bearing a text whethere in the form of signature or separate sheets fall in heading No.49.11.

But this note is silent about designs with nothings' which is what the subject goods were found on examination. This does not therefore justify its classification under 4901.

Description of goods as per invoice and bill of entry clearly ascertain the classification under heading 49.11.91.

General Rules of Interpretation also justify its inclusion under 4911.91.

Chapter Notes 4 and 5 do not exclude the goods from 4911.91.

ORDER

I therefore, order the subject goods to be classified under CTH No. 4911.91.

I order that the goods be released after payment of 100% duty. No penal action is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top